Back to Article

/

Birth Defects Gastroschisis in Babies

Article
Baby

Birth Defects Gastroschisis in Babies

Dr. Kate Dudek • July 15, 2025 • 5 min read

Birth Defects Gastroschisis in Babies article image

Gastroschisis is a rare birth defect that affects 2-5 per 10,000 newborns (0.02-0.05%). It occurs when the baby’s intestines are found outside the body because of a 2-5cm opening on the right side of the belly button. The defect arises during the first trimester of pregnancy, when the primordial umbilical ring is forming. In some cases it is diagnosed by ultrasound at 18-20 weeks of pregnancy, otherwise it is diagnosed at delivery.

Standard treatment for gastroschisis is surgical repair of the defect, once the protruding organs have been slowly returned to the abdominal cavity. This technique is known as silo repair.

What are the health implications?

Babies who are born with gastroschisis have a smaller than normal abdominal cavity. The organs that are displaced (most frequently the intestines, but sometimes the stomach and liver too) are not encased in a membranous sac, meaning they are exposed to the amniotic fluid that surrounds the baby in utero. This fluid is an irritant to the delicate developing organs and can cause them to become swollen, inflamed and thickened; they may also develop an overlying fibrous peel.

The intestine may be short, or twisted, and as a result blood flow to the bowel can be disrupted. 10% of infants born with the condition will have gastrointestinal tract abnormalities and many experience delays in their bowel function due to poor absorption and deficient movement of food through the digestive system. Even after surgery to repair the defect, babies with this condition often struggle with eating and digesting, with many continuing to gain most of their nutrition via an IV line. They are also at increased risk of infections, dehydration and hypothermia.

What are Risk Factors for Gastroschisis?

The biggest risks for having a baby with gastroschisis are being a young mother and being a smoker. Expectant mothers who have been diagnosed with a genitourinary tract infection (GUI) and/or given medication for herpes (antiherpetics) are also at greater risk.

One study found that women who were under 20 years of age, smoked and had been diagnosed with a GUI have a risk of developing gastroschisis that is 25 times higher than women who are over 20, do not smoke and have not had a GUI. If the GUI is present at the time of conception it can cause cell destruction and inflammation at the site of the umbilical cord attachment, giving one possible mechanism for this type of defect.

It remains unclear why younger women have a greater risk of developing gastroschisis. One explanation is that women who are under 20 are statistically more likely to develop a GUI or STI, both of which increase the risk of this birth defect. The increased prevalence of GUIs in younger women is, in part, due to their cervical histology making this type of infection more likely. Thus, alternative environmental risk factors possibly exacerbate the risk of gastroschisis in a group that is already considered to be higher risk.

Herpes infections during pregnancy can have detrimental effects on the developing foetus. To reduce the likelihood of pregnancy complications, including premature labour, low birth weight and foetal anomalies, a mother-to-be with clinically diagnosed herpes will routinely be prescribed antiherpetic medications. Herpes infection during pregnancy is not common and it is thought that fewer than 5% of pregnant women require any sort of antiviral medication during their pregnancy; however, antiherpetic use is associated with a four-fold increased risk of gastroschisis.

The Pathogenesis of Gastroschisis

It is not fully understood what causes gastroschisis. The rarity of the condition makes it difficult to study real-life examples.

One theory is that in the very early days of pregnancy, perhaps as soon as 35 days after conception, there is a defect in the formation of the amnio-ectodermal junction (the primitive umbilical ring). During a normal pregnancy, the ring forms in the first few weeks post-implantation and a number of the early embryonic structures pass through it, enabling the embryonic cavity to enlarge and the umbilical cord to start forming.

These early structures give rise to loops of the developing bowel, which, by week 10 of pregnancy, still protrudes through the umbilical ring. Towards the end of the third month of pregnancy the protruding bowel retracts back into the developing abdominal cavity. It is thought that in cases of gastroschisis, this process is disrupted, possibly through non-closure of the ring, or a rupture to the delicate membrane surrounding the ring, localised to the right hand side, preventing the bowel from fully retracting into the abdominal cavity.

Identification of the condition in sets of siblings and distantly related family members has suggested a genetic component. However, to date, no consistent genetic abnormalities have been identified across patients. It is therefore more likely that multiple genes are involved, rendering a female more susceptible to the environmental risk factors associated with gastroschisis. The specific gene mutations that have been identified to date, require further investigation to support or disprove a causative role.

Another proposed mechanism is some sort of vascular compromise as a result of the right umbilical vein failing to develop properly. This would create a possible site for thrombosis, weakening the area and leading to the problems associated with gastroschisis.

The association between gastroschisis and smoking is thought to occur as a result of genetic variations, known as SNPs (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms), which are more frequently observed in maternal smokers than nonsmokers.

The most likely explanation is that gastroschisis is multifactorial in origin; possibly caused by a genetic susceptibility, in combination with environmental factors, such as young age, smoking and GUI/STI exposure. These environmental factors may then make developmental defects more likely.

Nabta is reshaping women’s healthcare. We support women with their personal health journeys, from everyday wellbeing to the uniquely female experiences of fertility, pregnancy, and menopause

Get in touch if you have any questions about this article or any aspect of women’s health. We’re here for you. 

Sources:

  • Ahrens, K A, et al. “Antiherpetic Medication Use and the Risk of Gastroschisis: Findings from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2007.” Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, vol. 27, no. 4, July 2013, pp. 340–345., doi:10.1111/ppe.12064.
  • “Facts about Gastroschisis.” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/birthdefects/gastroschisis.html.
  • Feldkamp, M L, et al. “Risk of Gastroschisis with Maternal Genitourinary Infections: the US National Birth Defects Prevention Study 1997–2011.” BMJ Open, vol. 9, no. 3, 30 Mar. 2019, p. e026297., doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026297.
  • “Gastroschisis.” National Organization for Rare Disorders, 2019, rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/gastroschisis/.
  • Kliman, H J. “The Umbilical Cord.” The Encyclopaedia of Reproduction, Yale University School of Medicine, 29 Oct. 2006, medicine.yale.edu/obgyn/kliman/placenta/research/Umbilical Cord EOR_163162_284_18220_v1.pdf.
  • Lubinsky, M. “A Vascular and Thrombotic Model of Gastroschisis.” American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, vol. 164A, no. 4, Apr. 2014, pp. 915–917., doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.36370.
  • Opitz, J M, et al. “An Evolutionary and Developmental Biology Approach to Gastroschisis.” Birth Defects Research, vol. 111, no. 6, 1 Apr. 2019, pp. 294–311., doi:10.1002/bdr2.1481.
  • Torfs, Claudine P., et al. “Selected Gene Polymorphisms and Their Interaction with Maternal Smoking, as Risk Factors for Gastroschisis.” Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, vol. 76, no. 10, Oct. 2006, pp. 723–730., doi:10.1002/bdra.20310.

Download the Nabta App

Related Articles

Placeholder
Baby
Childbirth
Pregnancy
Article

Is Performing a C-Section Better Than Inducing Labour? [2024]

Is Performing a C-Section Better Than Inducing Labour, when it comes to giving birth, usually the preferred option is to let labour proceed naturally. However, there are times when it is not in the mother or baby’s interest for this to happen. When the health of either is at risk, or if gestation has exceeded [41 weeks duration,](https://nabtahealth.com/articles/doctor-tips-weeks-27-40/) then it is highly probable that an alternative strategy will need to be implemented. There are two options available, [inducing labour](../) or performing a [C-section](../). With an induction, the [uterus](https://nabtahealth.com/glossary/uterus/) is artificially stimulated to contract, and it is then hoped that labour will proceed as per a natural delivery. In contrast, a C-section is a surgical procedure, whereby a cut is made in the abdomen and the baby is removed that way, rather than via the [vagina](https://nabtahealth.com/glossary/vagina/). Sometimes the only safe option is to perform a C-section, for example if the baby is breach, or when an emergency situation arises. However, there are other times when you may be presented with a choice and if this happens, what is the correct answer? Unfortunately there is no definitive right answer. An induction can be at least as safe as spontaneous labour and, if performed in the week prior to the [due date](https://nabtahealth.com/glossary/due-date/), it is thought to reduce [the risk of](https://nabtahealth.com/articles/what-is-preeclampsia/) [preeclampsia](https://nabtahealth.com/glossary/preeclampsia/) in the mother and respiratory distress in the child, possibly as a result of the [placenta](https://nabtahealth.com/glossary/placenta/) remaining fully functional. Unlike C-sections, inductions are not surgical procedures and thus, if all goes to plan, the recovery period is shorter. It is however, a big ‘IF’. [Induced labours](https://nabtahealth.com/articles/induction-of-labour/) are typically more painful, meaning more women will request stronger pain relief including epidurals, and there is a greater likelihood of assisted delivery, such as the use of forceps or ventouse. There is also an increased [risk of hyperstimulation](https://nabtahealth.com/articles/what-is-ovarian-drilling/) of the [uterus](https://nabtahealth.com/glossary/uterus/)., Uterine hyperstimulation causes more frequent, longer [contractions](https://nabtahealth.com/glossary/contraction/), which can [lead](https://nabtahealth.com/glossary/lead/) to complications such as foetal heart rate abnormalities and, in rare cases, uterine rupture. In a significant number of women, induction does not work and a C-section becomes necessary. The advent of the C-section was undoubtedly a medical revolution, instantly saving the lives of millions of women and children. However, C-sections bring with them all the risks of regular surgery, including blood clots, wound infection and bleeding. The recovery period is typically longer after a C-section than after a natural birth, driving restrictions are enforced and a scar remains, although this will fade over time. Whilst current guidelines stipulate that an induction should only be performed when [the risks of continuing the pregnancy](https://nabtahealth.com/articles/complications-during-pregnancy-polyhydramnios/) outweighs the benefits, with more women than ever requesting elective C-sections, the World Health Organisation has highlighted an urgent need for medical assessment efforts to address the risks of induced labour compared to elective C-section. Until such work is undertaken, it becomes a matter of individual circumstance, personal choice and ultimately weighing up what is best for you and your baby. **Sources:** * Grobman, W A, et al. “Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women.” _The New England Journal of Medicine_, vol. 379, no. 6, 9 Aug. 2018, pp. 513–523., doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1800566. * WHO Recommendations for Induction of Labour. World Health Organisation, [http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44531/9789241501156\_eng.pdf?sequence=1](http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44531/9789241501156_eng.pdf?sequence=1). Accessed on 23/01/2019. * _Inducing Labour. Clinical Guideline \[CG70\]_. NICE (National Institute for Care and Health Excellence), July 2008, www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg70/chapter/Introduction. Accessed on 23/01/2019

Dr. Kate DudekJuly 14, 2024 . 3 min read
Placeholder
Baby
Article

When can Your Child eat Sushi and raw Fish?

Sushi is considered a healthy eating option and its popularity is growing in the US. Many parents wonder if it is safe for their young child to eat sushi and when they can safely introduce it in the diet. According to the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), there is no need to delay the introduction of fish or shellfish beyond [4-6 months](https://nabtahealth.com/articles/when-can-your-child-eat-sushi-and-raw-fish/) of age in healthy, low food allergy risk children. Specifics about whether the fish is cooked or raw are not made, and the assumption is that this stance reflects cooked fish and shellfish. The Food and Drug Administration ([FDA](https://nabtahealth.com/glossary/fda-2/)) specifies that no raw fish or shellfish should be given to high-risk groups, highlighting very young children as one such group. At what age is a child no longer considered at high-risk? --------------------------------------------------------- A [child’s immune system](https://nabtahealth.com/articles/when-can-your-child-eat-sushi-and-raw-fish/) development is slow and steady during the first 2-3 years of life, and by age 4-6 years old, adult levels of immunity are seen. Your [child’s immune](https://nabtahealth.com/articles/can-daycare-build-your-childs-immune-system/) system continues to develop throughout [puberty](https://nabtahealth.com/glossary/puberty/). Given this information, waiting until 5-6 years of age to introduce raw fish and uncooked sushi is the best way. This will ensure your child is defended against potentially harmful substances.    Bacterial contamination is a threat to any temperature sensitive food and cannot be seen, smelled or tasted. [Food poisoning](https://nabtahealth.com/articles/how-to-avoid-food-poisoning-during-pregnancy/) symptoms are similar to the stomach flu, so they may be hard to detect. Asking questions about the quality of food and how it is prepared is good. However, taking care to eat at reputable restaurants that you trust can help prevent adverse reactions to contaminated sushi. US restaurants are required to use sushi that has been properly frozen and/or cooked to eliminate parasitic contamination. ##### Food allergies The [Food Allergy](https://nabtahealth.com/articles/4-ways-to-know-if-your-child-has-a-food-allergy/) and Anaphylaxis Network states that about 7 million people in the US have a reported seafood allergy. In addition to seafood allergy risk, Asian cuisine can often contain other allergens such as peanut, egg, tree nut, and soy ingredients. Raw or cooked sushi is typically assembled into a firm, round food. Sashimi is a raw piece of fish set atop a small amount of rice; it has a slippery texture. Both sushi and sashimi may present a choking hazard, especially for young toddlers. A child to eat sushi may also have a sticky texture that may be foreign to the child. Cutting cooked sushi into small pieces before serving it to your toddler can minimize the risk of choking. When it comes to raw sushi or sashimi, it may be best to leave it out of your child’s diet as they are young and building a strong immune system. However, there is no reason why your toddler can’t safely enjoy cooked or vegetarian Asian cuisine, with special attention paid to its ingredients. If you enjoy sushi and other Asian cuisines and want to pass this along to your child, think about alternatives to raw fish such as: Vegetable rolls ##### **Those containing only cooked fish and/or shellfish** * Rice bowls * Tempura * Soups * Salads * Stir-fry * Teriyaki The truth is that while food safety, allergies, and choking hazards should always be considered. There really is no consensus on an exact age that is appropriate to give a young child raw fish. By 5-6 years old, a healthy [child’s immune system](https://nabtahealth.com/articles/can-daycare-build-your-childs-immune-system/) should be strong enough to graduate to raw sushi with the rest of the family. No magical age, grade level, or number of exposures to sushi will prevent the occurrence of an illness from contaminated food. Good judgment and necessary precautions should always be in place. **Sources:** * U.S * Food & Drug Administration * Fresh and Frozen Seafood: Selecting and Serving it Safely. KidsSafe Seafood. Food Allergy and Anaphylactic Network. Powered by Bundoo®

Jill Castle, MS, RDNMay 14, 2024 . 4 min read
Placeholder
Baby
Body
Childcare
Health
Parenting
Toddler
Article

Is it Safe for Toddlers and Children to eat raw Oysters?

Food-borne illnesses do not discriminate — anyone can become sick. Raw oysters have earned a reputation as a potentially dangerous food. Also, some groups of people have a [greater risk of serious illness](https://nabtahealth.com/articles/is-fish-oil-safe-for-children/) than others, including children. Eating raw oysters comes with the risk of being exposed to Vibrio vulnificus, a potentially life-threatening bacteria. Young children, those under 5 years of age, are more susceptible to food-borne illness because their immunity isn’t fully developed. Here are some facts you should know before you give your young child raw oysters: ##### What will happen if my child eats a contaminated oyster? In reality, allowing your [child to eat](https://nabtahealth.com/articles/is-it-safe-for-toddlers-and-children-to-eat-raw-oysters/) raw oysters might have zero consequences, no matter how many he or she eats. Unlike other bacteria, V. vulnificus cannot be smelled, seen, or tasted. There is no way to determine if the raw oyster is safe to eat. V. vulnificus cannot be killed by a lot of hot sauce, nor are you guaranteed safety by letting your child just try one or two oysters. If your [child eats a raw oyster](https://nabtahealth.com/articles/is-it-safe-for-toddlers-and-children-to-eat-raw-oysters/) that is contaminated with V. vulnificus, it is important to be familiar with the signs and symptoms of food poisoning. In generally healthy people, V. vulnificus can cause vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal pain. In some cases, it can become worse and infect the blood (invasive septicemia) resulting in fever, chills, and septic shock. V. vulnificus is a serious cause for concern because about half of people who contract the blood infection die. If you are suspicious of food poisoning and/or your child has symptoms, get in touch with your healthcare provider, or even head to the ER. ##### What should I do? To be safe, you may want to hold off on feeding your child raw oysters for a few years, or at least until he or she is five years of age. If oysters are a staple in your household, or a special treat here and there, make sure to thoroughly cook a few for your little one to try. Cooking (prolonged exposure to high heat) is the only way to kill the bacteria and make sure you and your family will be safe. Get yourself a [coach](https://nabtahealth.com/product/conscious-motherhood-coaching-session/) and learn more. **Sources:** * Food & Drug Administration * Raw Oyster Myths. Powered by Bundoo®

Jill Castle, MS, RDNMay 9, 2024 . 2 min read